Programme/Approved Electives for 2024/25
None
Available as a Free Standing Elective
No
Statecraft is gendered and gendering. Until the mid-twentieth century it was solely the preserve of elite men. This module explores the intersection of political science and gender studies in International Relations (IR). Through engaging case studies about diplomacy and espionage, students will analyse how international statecraft and institutions have been shaped by gender dynamics and, in turn, national and global power, hierarchies, and status. The course will delve into diplomatic and bureaucratic aspects of national statecraft and develop students' sensitivity to the roles, experiences, representation, and legacies of men and women representing the State over time.
Aims
This module explores the intersection of political science and gender studies in International Relations (IR). Through engaging case studies, students will analyse how international statecraft has been shaped by gender dynamics and, in turn, influenced notions of national and global power, hierarchies and status. The course will delve into diplomatic and bureaucratic aspects of national statecraft and develop students' sensitivity to the role of individuals representing the State through this new and innovative sub-discipline of IR.
Intended Learning Outcomes
Critique the gendered and gendering nature of modern diplomacy and espionage in international relations: 2Analyse the variety of roles undertaken by men and women in modern statecraft and the significance of intersectional identities (class, race, sexuality, and generation) upon the making of international relations: 1,2Demonstrate a systematic understanding of representations of masculinity and femininity in statecraft, past and present, through different case studies in order to make sense of global inequalities: 1,2Judge between relevant scholarly debates about gender, diplomacy and espionage, weighing evidence to bolster arguments and to persuade others: 2Deploy evidence accurately in academic arguments, and demonstrate how this evidence might challenge or extend existing scholarly debates: 2Formulate arguments on a variety of scholarly approaches: 2Communicate clearly and concisely about complex themes on the module for a non-academic audience: 1
This module will be taught through:11 hours attendance at lectures;11 hours attendance at seminars;44 hours of structured engagement with online resources (digitally available, weekly readings, lecture slides) in preparation for tutorials;24 hours independent study in preparation of blog;60 hours independent study in preparation of essay.
Description of Module Assessment
1: Short Paper weighted 25%Blog post - 500 wordsStudents will choose a module topic, or a theme of their choosing, to write a blog for a general audience. The blog should include evidence, visual images, suggested further reading to scholarly work but no footnotes for students to demonstrate the communication of theoretical concepts concisely. An example of a blog will be posted on the KLE. This assignment requires students to demonstrate comprehension of case studies and to write about them clearly: an important building block in preparation for assignment 2 and for employability skills.
2: Essay weighted 75%Essay - 2500 wordsStudents will answer a question from a list of essay questions, dealing with generic and specific themes of the module and encourage students to apply scholarly approaches, key concepts and theories, to empirical case studies.