Regulation C9

1. Definitions

The following definitions shall apply in respect of these regulations:

Assessment Criteria: The guidelines for marking approved from time to time by Senate which are to be interpreted by examiners in the context of the subject.

Award: Any formal qualification awarded by the University to an individual student.

Compulsory Module: A module which is compulsory for students registered on a specified course.  Compulsory modules count towards a course’s subject credit requirements.

Course: A collection of modules or units of study grouped under a specific title, the details of which have been approved by Senate as leading to the Doctorate.

Co-requisites: Modules which must be studied concurrently by students registered on a specified course.

Course Regulations: The regulations governing one or more specified courses.

Credit: In a modular course, the unit of academic value by which successful completion of a module contributes to a student’s programme of study.

Elective Module: A module a student can study as part of their course, but which does not count towards their course’s subject credit requirements.

Examination: A written assessment with fixed time-limit conducted under examination conditions in an examination hall designated by the Head of Student Records and Examinations for the purpose. Examinations which are not unseen may be either seen, where the student is advised of the content of the paper prior to the examination although the paper is written under normal examination conditions, or open-book for which students may bring into the examination specified material which can be highlighted or underlined but not annotated.

Examination Period: A period which is set aside for the conduct of examinations.

In-Course Assessment: Any assessment which is not an examination and which shall not exceed such maximum requirements as may be determined by Senate from time to time.

Level 8: Modules, the standard of whose learning outcomes is appropriate to a postgraduate award at Level 8 as defined in the National Qualifications Framework.

All designations refer to the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ) as set out in the conversion table.

Module: A separate identifiable self-contained unit of a course of study which is at a specified level, is assessed and is given a credit value.

Module Assessment: The processes by which it is ascertained whether, and at what standard of performance, a module has been completed and the learning outcomes thereof achieved.

Module Catalogue: Documentation which describes the modules available to students.

Optional Module: A module selected from a group of available modules.  Optional modules count towards a course’s subject credit requirements.

Part 1: That part of the course which shall comprise modules or other designated units of study equivalent to at most 50% of the total assessment for the course.

Part 2: That part of the course which shall be a period of research leading to the submission of a thesis.

Precursor: A module, the study hours of which a student shall be required to have completed in order to proceed to a subsequent specified module or modules, but for which credit may not necessarily have been awarded.

Prerequisite: A module in which a student shall be required to have received credit in order to proceed to a subsequent specified module or modules.

Programme of Study: The specific modules or other units of study pursued by individual students within the context of an approved course.

Unit of Study: An element of Part 1 of a course which is not organised as a module and is designated in the course regulations.

Any reference in these regulations to Senate shall be deemed to include a reference to any committee of Senate designated by Senate for the purpose.

Any reference in these regulations to the Director of Student and Academic Services, Head of Department/School, or other named officer of the University shall be deemed to include a reference to any person designated by that officer for the purpose.

2. Admission

2.1 Any student admitted to the Doctorate course under these regulations shall be required as a minimum to:

(a) either

i. be a Level 7 graduate of Keele, of any other University approved for this purpose, or of the Council for National Academic Awards; 

ii. be a graduate of Keele, of the Council for National Academic Awards of or any other University approved for this purpose, who also has appropriate professional experience;

iii. be any other person whose qualifications and/or relevant professional experience are deemed by the Senate to be acceptable. Persons applying under this sub-clause may be required to take a qualifying examination; and

(b) meet any particular entry requirements for the course applied for, as specified in the relevant course regulations; and

(c) provide approved identification at enrolment; and

(d) provide original copies of academic transcripts or certificates used for admission if requested; and

(e) enrol in each session with the University by a date to be determined by the University Executive Committee; and

(f) provide a valid UK contact address at all times whilst enrolled as a student; and

(g) Students who do not abide by points (a)-(f) above will be withdrawn from the University

2.2 Head of Planning and Admissions, in consultation with the relevant Head(s)of Department/School, is authorised to offer applicants admission with advanced standing who already hold up to 120 credits at Level 7, provided always that no exemption shall be accorded for the Masters dissertation.

2.3 The University reserves the right to withdraw a student’s registration if the student is found at a later stage to have submitted a fraudulent application to the University.

2.4 Applicants requiring student visa route sponsorship to study in the UK must not only meet the entrance criteria for the course but also the requirements, rules and responsibilities of the UK Home Office for sponsorship. Therefore, an offer of a place does not guarantee automatic student visa route sponsorship and is at the discretion of the University.

3. Course Regulations

3.1 Where appropriate there shall be course regulations in a form approved by Senate.

3.2 The course regulations shall specify the designation of the award.

3.3 All such course regulations shall require the approval of Senate.

4. Modules and Units of Study

4.1 The credit value for any module shall be determined by reference to a common currency whereby one unit of credit represents the typical outcome of 10 hours of study. All modules shall have a credit value which is a multiple of 5, and no module shall have a value of less than 10.

4.2 Where a module is available for more than one course, its status as a compulsory, optional or elective may vary between courses.

4.3 Precursors, prerequisites and/or co-requisites may be defined for any module or unit of study.

4.4 Any fieldwork or similar requirements shall form part or all of one or more specified modules or units of study subject to any timetabling or other constraints. Any fieldwork or similar activity may be scheduled either within the approved semester dates, or at other times.

5. Structure of University Awards

5.1 A course leading to the award of the Doctorate shall comprise both a ‘Part 1’ and ‘Part 2’ as defined in section 1 above.

5.2 Part I shall consist of modules or units of study to the equivalent of not more than 50% of the total assessment for the award.

5.3 Part II shall consist of a thesis which shall contribute no less than 50% of the total assessment for the award.

5.4 Course regulations may permit a student who has successfully completed Part I to submit a dissertation of 15000 to 20000 words with a view to being examined for the award of MRes.

6. Responsibilities of Supervisors

6.1 The responsibilities and duties of supervisors shall be prescribed by Senate from time to time.

7. Programme of Study

7.1 All students shall be required to register for their programmes of study for the coming academic session by such a date as shall be determined by the Head of Student Records and Examinations.

7.2 No student shall undertake additional modules or other units of study outside of their approved programme of study without the prior approval of the Head of Student Records and Examinations.

8. Time-Limit

8.1 A thesis for a higher degree or by taught study or research must normally be submitted no later than the following periods after initial registration:

(a) Level 7: 24 months full-time, 48 months part-time

(b) Level 8: 48 months full-time, 96 months part-time

8.2 In case of illness or other special circumstance, the Senate may at its discretion, on receipt of an application from the relevant Postgraduate Committee justifying the request, extend the period within which a thesis must be submitted. In considering any such case the Senate may take account of any conditions of sponsorship with which the student is required to comply. Any extension will not normally exceed one calendar year.

It should be noted that a return to restricted timescales will require a return to the policy where if a student has a period of approved leave of absence, this will automatically extend the final date for submission by an equivalent period.

9. Assessment

Part 1 (Modular courses)

9.1 All modules shall be assessed in accordance with the University’s agreed assessment criteria, either by:

(a) in-course assessment conducted during the semester(s) in which the module(s) is/are completed; or

(b) examination during an examination period; or

(c) a combination of both 9.1.a and 9.1.b above.

9.2 The method of assessment for each module, including the weighting for each element of the assessment, shall be notified to students.

9.3 The minimum mark for a pass in each module shall be 50%. Where a student satisfies the examiners in a module, he/she shall be awarded the appropriate credits.

9.4 A student who passes a module in which they have has previously failed, shall be credited with the minimum mark for a pass irrespective of the actual mark achieved.

9.5 The assessment of all modules shall be University assessments.

9.6 A student who has been awarded credit in a module shall not be permitted to be reassessed in that module with a view to improving their mark, save under the provisions of paragraph 13.1.b below.

Part 1 (Non-modular courses)

9.7 All assessments shall be undertaken in accordance with the University’s agreed marking criteria.

9.8 The assessment methods for individual or groups of units of study shall be defined in the course regulations. The principles set out in paragraphs 9.1 to 9.6 above shall apply.

Part 2

9.9 A student is required to submit a thesis, the minimum and maximum lengths of which shall be defined in the course regulations but shall be in the range 50,000 60,000 words.

9.10 All students shall be required to attend an oral examination.

9.11 The thesis must be written in English except that in language subjects it may, at the discretion of the supervisor, be in the language concerned.

9.12 The thesis must be the student’s own account of their research and must be accompanied by such declaration to this effect as Senate may require. Any breach of this regulation may result in an allegation of academic misconduct under the terms of Regulation D1 Assessment.

9.13 Every copy of a thesis submitted must be accompanied by an abstract not exceeding 300 words.

9.14 The greater portion of the thesis must have been undertaken subsequent to the initial registration of the student. Any work undertaken earlier must be so acknowledged.

9.15 Students shall submit the thesis in such form and such manner as shall be determined by Senate from time to time.

9.16 Any thesis previously submitted to Keele or any other University may not normally be resubmitted, except as part of re-examination. However, a student may incorporate in a thesis work which has already been part of a thesis submitted for a higher degree in this or any other University, provided that this is clearly indicated in the thesis and on the form of entry and in the thesis.

9.17 Before the degree is conferred the candidate must lodge a copy of the thesis with the University Library, bound in a manner prescribed by the Library, which will be the property of the University.

10. Appropriate Engagement With Studies and Assessments

10.1 Any student failing to engage appropriately with their studies within two weeks of a final academic warning being issued may be withdrawn from the University by the Director of Student and Academic Services or nominee at any stage in the programme.  Failure to engage appropriately with studies shall include non-attendance at compulsory learning and teaching events and/or failure to submit assessments without prior consent.

10.2 Any student failing to engage appropriately with assessments, without prior consent, may be withdrawn from the University by the Director of Student and Academic Services or nominee within 2 weeks of the formal communication of each semester’s module results to students.  A student will be deemed to have failed to engage with their assessments if they obtain a mark of 10 or below in 50% or more of the modules they have studied in the most recent semester.

10.3 Any student who is withdrawn as a result of 10.1 or 10.2 above will forfeit their entitlement to undertake any remaining assessment opportunities upon their failed modules, including assessment opportunities granted as a result of exceptional circumstances.

11. Student Health and Wellbeing

11.1 Students must be in an adequate state of physical and mental health to enable them to continue with their studies. Information on Leave of Absence, which may be an option for those needing a break from their studies to support their health and wellbeing, is included in Regulation B4 Fitness to Study.

12. Determination of Results

12.1 There shall be a Board of Examiners for each course approved by Senate which shall determine and make recommendations to Senate on:

(a) the student’s mark for each module or unit of study; and that

(b) the student be permitted to proceed from Part I to Part II of the course; or

(c) the student not be permitted to proceed from Part I to Part II of the course; or

(d) the student be awarded the Doctorate; or

(e) the student not be awarded the Doctorate; or

(f) the student, having pursued the option available under the provisions of paragraph 5.4 above, be awarded the degree of MRes; or

(g) the student be required to withdraw from the University.

12.2 No student shall be permitted to proceed from Part I to Part II unless they have achieved all required credits or passed all units of study and/or has satisfied such other criteria as may be required by the course regulations.

12.3 No student shall be permitted to continue to pursue a programme of study where it would be impossible for them to complete the course and do so within the approved time-limit.

12.4 A student who has failed one or more modules or units of study on two occasions shall be required to withdraw from the course.

13. Action to be Taken in Respect of Academic Failure by Students

13.1 Where the student has not been required to withdraw from the University, the relevant Board of Examiners shall determine whether:

(a) the student shall be permitted to be re-assessed once only in the failed module(s) or units of study, either:

i. at the next examination period; or

ii. with or without attendance on the module(s) or unit(s) of study at the next opportunity; and/or

(b) in the case of failure in an option module(s) or unit(s) of study, the student shall be permitted to pursue an alternative option(s) with attendance during the following session or calendar year but not subject to the limitation imposed by paragraph 9.4 above; or

(c) the award of the Doctorate be made once revisions have been made to the thesis to the satisfaction of the Board; or

(d) although the required standard for the Doctorate has not been met, the submission is of sufficient merit to justify the student being permitted to re-present the thesis and to submit to a further oral examination within two years from the date of the decision at the relevant meeting of Senate.

13.2 A student who is permitted to be re-assessed in any form of in-course assessment other than the thesis shall not be permitted to re-submit modified versions of their original work, but shall be required to submit for assessment a new work from that which originally failed to satisfy the examiners.

13.3 Where a student who has been examined under the provisions of paragraph 5.4 above fails to satisfy the examiners in the dissertation, the examiners shall follow the provisions available for the retrieval of the failure under Regulation C7 Taught Postgraduate Degrees.

14. Award

14.1 A student shall be eligible for the award of the Doctorate who has successfully completed both Parts I and II of the course.

14.2 Neither the Doctorate nor an MRes awarded under the provisions of paragraphs 5.4 above shall be graded.

14.3 Posthumous

(a) A postgraduate research degree may be conferred posthumously where the death of a candidate occurs prior to their completion of the requirements for their award. A posthumous award may be accepted on the candidate's behalf by a parent, spouse or other appropriate individual. Where a candidate’s thesis has been submitted for examination but not yet examined, examiners are to be appointed in the usual way and shall submit reports to the Research Degrees Committee for consideration.

(b) If the death of a candidate occurs before submission of their thesis for examination, the Research Degrees Committee shall consider available evidence of the candidate’s ability. A sufficient amount of the research must have been completed in order to properly determine that the required standard has been achieved and the supervisor shall submit a written statement to support the recommendation.

14.4 Aegrotat

(a) An aegrotat award for incomplete study may be conferred in exceptional circumstances, such as in cases where a candidate's ability to complete an award is permanently compromised by severe illness. All research awards are available as aegrotat awards with the exception of degrees which are subject to fitness to practice requirements and, where a programme of study has professional body requirements, accreditation will not take place. As an aegrotat award is a final exit award it must be considered to be the conclusion of a candidate's programme of study. Before a recommendation for an aegrotat award is submitted, the candidate must have indicated that they are willing to accept the award and they understand that this involves waiving the right to be reassessed.

(b) Where a candidate’s thesis has been submitted for examination but not yet examined, examiners are to be appointed in the usual way and shall submit reports to the Research Degrees Committee for consideration.

(c) Where submission of the thesis for examination has not taken place, the Research Degrees Committee shall consider available evidence of the candidate’s ability. A sufficient amount of the research must have been completed in order to properly determine that the required standard has been achieved and the supervisor shall submit a written statement to support the recommendation.

15. Structure and Content of Re-Assessments

15.1 Where a student is required to be re-assessed for one or more modules or units of study prior to the start of the following academic year, the re-assessment shall, unless the relevant Board of Examiners decides that this is not practical, be of the same structure and be based upon the same syllabus as the assessment at the time of the initial failure, but need not include those elements of assessment in which the student has already satisfied the examiners.

15.2 Where a student is permitted to be re-assessed in one or more failed modules or units of study without attendance on the module(s) or unit(s) of study, the following arrangements shall apply:

(a) for re-assessment within one year of the initial failure, the re-assessment shall, unless the relevant Board of Examiners decides that this is not practical, be of the same structure and be based upon the same syllabus as the assessment at the time of the initial failure;

(b) for re-assessment beyond one year of the initial failure, where the structure of the assessment is different from that at the time of the initial failure and/or the re-assessment is to be based upon a different syllabus, the Head of Department/School concerned shall make arrangements for the student to be:

i. informed of changes in the structure of the assessment and the syllabus content; and

ii. offered, at an appropriate charge, the opportunity of attending relevant classes and/or receiving other appropriate academic assistance.

1. SCOPE

1.1 This regulation covers all professional doctorates offered by the University and sets out the fundamental structure of such degree programmes and the requirements to obtain an award. Where there are programme specific deviations or exemptions from this or other University’s Regulations, these will be set out in an annex to the relevant programme specification. The University considers those on professional doctorate programmes to be postgraduate researchers and, as such, you are covered by the University’s Postgraduate Research Degrees Code of Practice‌.

2. ADMISSION

2.1 To be admitted to a Professional Doctorate programme, you must provide approved identification at enrolment and provide original copies of academic transcripts or certificates if requested. You must also have one of the following:

(a) a bachelor's degree, normally with First or Upper Second Class Honours, from a higher education institution or the equivalent if you have been educated outside the UK; and

(b) a Masters Degree, or the equivalent if you have been educated outside the UK and hold the qualification normally in the general field you are applying within, or its equivalent in professional experience and a professionally accredited programme.

Applicants without a Masters degree will be considered on a case-by-case basis, where they can provide evidence of relevant professional experience or other experiential prior learning. If you are accepted under this sub clause you might be required to take an examination or attend an interview.

2.2 By accepting a place at the University, you confirm that you will abide by the University’s rules, regulations and policies which are set out in the Keele Academic Regulations and Policies.

2.3 We will withdraw your registration if we find that you submitted a fraudulent application to the University.

2.4 If you require student visa route sponsorship to study in the UK you must meet the entrance criteria for the programme of study (see paragraph 2.1 above) and the requirements, rules and responsibilities of the UK Home Office for sponsorship. An offer of admittance to the degree programme does not guarantee student visa route sponsorship and any offer of sponsorship is made at our discretion.

2.5 Recognition of Prior Learning

It may be possible to be admitted to the programme based some prior learning which may also exempt you from some of the requirements of the taught phase of your programme but not from the thesis requirements. Where you are admitted with recognition of prior learning or with advanced standing, the value and level of credits recognised by the University in relation to meeting the requirements of your programme will be determined in line with the University's Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy .

3. REGISTRATION

3.1 You must enrol with the University within three weeks of starting your programme. You must re-register in each academic year by a date set by Academic Registry.

3.2 If you withdraw or allow your registration to lapse before completing your programme of study you will not be allowed to re-register, unless you get permission from the Research Degrees Committee (RDC) on behalf of Senate and meet any conditions RDC sets.

4. PROGRAMMES FOR HIGHER DEGREES BY RESEARCH

4.1 You must study your programme for the minimum supervision period (see the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees) with the guidance of a supervisory team. The supervisory team will include a lead supervisor and (with the exception of PhD by Publication) a minimum of one other team member. The minimum supervision period is the period from enrolment to the formal submission of a thesis excluding all periods of Leave of Absence. Extensions granted by the Research Degrees Committee will normally be for a maximum of one calendar year.

4.2 While you are at the taught stage of the programme, you may be able to change your programme of study until three weeks after the start of a semester, subject to the approval of the receiving Head(s) of School or nominee and depending on having met the pre-requisite academic requirements for your new programme.

4.3 If you are allowed to change your programme, you may have to successfully complete additional modules or thesis requirements to meet the programme requirements overall.

4.4 You cannot study additional modules outside of your programme of study during the taught stage of the programme, other than language modules offered by the Language Centre.

4.5 In exceptional circumstances the Research Degrees Committee, on behalf of Senate may approve early submission of a thesis. However, we reserve the right to charge the full tuition fees for the minimum registration period stated in Regulation C1.

5. RESPONSIBILITIES AND SUPERVISION

5.1 The responsibilities and duties for postgraduate researchers and their supervisors, including the process to be followed for supervisory team changes are stated in the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees.

6. STRUCTURE OF PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE PROGRAMMES

6.1 Overall Structure

Professional Doctorate programmes consist of a taught stage and an independent research stage.

6.2 Taught Stage

6.2.1. To be awarded a Professional Doctorate Degree, you must successfully pass at least 180 credits in the Taught Stage. As noted in section 2.5 the credit requirement in the taught phase may differ where Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) has been applied.

6.2.2 The taught stage of all professional doctorate programmes is modular. The credit value for any module is a multiple of 5, and no module has a value of less than 10. One credit equals 10 learning hours.

6.2.3 All modules in your programme of study are either compulsory or optional. Modules may have prerequisites, co-requisites and barred combinations and this is set out in the Programme Specification for your programme here. Modules must be taken in the order prescribed by the programme specification as appropriate.

6.2.4 Any module may be offered in semester one, semester two, over both semesters or, exceptionally, outside the approved semester dates.

6.2.5 Each module for a professional doctorate programme will be allocated to a specific level of study, which will be either at Level 7 or Level 8, with the exception of language modules.

6.3 Independent Research Stage

6.3.1 The independent research stage is non-modular. To complete the independent research stage you must submit a doctoral thesis of the specified length, pass an oral examination and successfully implement any changes to the thesis prescribed by the examiners where this is required.

7. TAUGHT STAGE: MODULE ASSESSMENT AND REASSESSMENT

6.1 You can find the rules describing the assessment and reassessment of taught modules in Regulation D1.

6.2 Modules available at the taught stage on Professional Doctorate programmes will be marked based on the University marking criteria. Additional subject-specific marking criteria may apply.

8. TAUGHT STAGE: MODULE CONDONEMENT AND COMPENSATION

8.1 Where your programme of study allows the awarding of credit through condonement and / or compensation of modules, this is detailed in Regulation D5.

9. PROGRESS REVIEW 1

9.1 To be eligible to enter the independent research phase of the programme and embark on your thesis, you will be required to pass Progress Review 1 (previously known as doctoral progression review) which will normally take place after the completion of the taught stage. The review will include a formal progression meeting with a panel approved by the School Professional Doctorate Lead from your Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee. You will not pass Progress Review 1 until you fulfil the relevant research training requirements as set out in the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees. For details of when progress reviews are due for different modes of attendance, see the Progress Review Handbook.

9.2 The relevant Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee will decide that:

(a) you are suitable for doctoral study and you can progress to the independent research stage of your programme; or

(b) you are not yet suitable for progression and. following review, will be given a programme of work to complete over a maximum period of four months. After this period the Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee will confirm the appropriate final outcome. Details on the resubmission process can be found in the Progress Review Handbook; or

(c) you are not suitable for doctoral study, but are suitable for an interim exit award available for your programme.

9.3 If you are dissatisfied with the decision under paragraph 9.2 above you can appeal the decision - Regulation B6 Academic Appeals.

 

10. ACADEMIC STANDING

10.1 If you fail to maintain a satisfactory standard of work the relevant committee can withdraw you from the University at any stage in your programme of study.

10.2 The following are examples of failing to maintain a satisfactory standard of work:

(a) failing to maintain a satisfactory standard of work or active engagement with your studies for at least four calendar weeks, resulting in the implementation of an academic warning procedure;

(b) dangerous and / or unsatisfactory professional conduct;

(c) failing to pass or fulfil the requirements for any assessment which you must take as part of your programme of study.

10.3 The Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees and the Progress Review Handbook set out the formal procedures for academic warnings, recommendations for withdrawal, and the appeals process.

11. PGR HEALTH AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE

This section of the Regulation is supported by the Leave of Absence Procedure for postgraduate researchers, as set out in the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees.

11.1 A leave of absence is an approved absence from the University. The absence period is a minimum of one month up to a maximum of 12 months, normally. During this time you must not undertake your studies.

11.2 You can take a leave of absence only if it is agreed and authorised by the Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee.

11.3 You can request a leave of absence for the following reasons:

(a) medical reasons;

(b) maternity / paternity / adoption leave;

(c) bereavement;

(d) personal Financial Hardship;

(e) other valid personal reasons.

Where appropriate, we will request documentary evidence to support a leave of absence request.

11.4 You must submit any request for a leave of absence through the University's established procedures These are outlined in the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees and accompanying guidance on changes in your registration status.

11.5 You will normally receive communications from the University about re-registration a minimum of one month before your leave of absence is due to end. Before re-enrolment is approved, fitness to study evidence may be required. You must respond to these communications.

11.6 Applications for a leave of absence lasting longer than one academic year will be considered only in exceptional circumstances. You must apply for the leave of absence to the Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee. The Committee will seek specialist advice where necessary and will decide if permission will be granted. The Committee can also set conditions.

11.7 If you experience difficulties but do not want to take a leave of absence you should speak to your Postgraduate Research Director to discuss submitting an extension request.

Further guidance about extensions can be found i the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees.

11.8 We may decide that it is in your interest to take a leave of absence, due to the state of your health, even if you have not applied for one. This is because you must be healthy enough to enable you to conduct your studies. We can, on the basis of professional advice, require you to:

(a) take a compulsory leave of absence until we are satisfied that you may resume your studies; or

(b) in exceptional circumstances, be withdrawn from the University.

11.9 You can appeal against the decision of the University to require a compulsory leave of absence or withdrawal based on your state of health.

11.10 You can appeal on one or both of the foillowing grounds:

(a) Procedural irregularity in the conduct of the case;

(b) There is new evidence that can be proven, including exceptional circumstances, which was not known at the time, and may have affected the outcome had the Faculty Research Committee (and the Research Degrees Committee) known. There must be a valid reason for not making it known at the time.

11.11 You must submit your appeal in writing to the Academic Registrar within 10 working days of the date of the letter sent informing you of the decision.

11.12 The Academic Registrar will chair a Support to Study Appeals Panel, which will decide whether a case exists and advise you of the outcome within 10 working days.

11.13 In the event of a conflict of interest, the Academic Registrar will nominate an appropriate member of staff to deal with your appeal on their behalf. If this is the case, you will be notified of the name of the nominated person in writing.

11.14 You can submit a grievance to the University Council under the terms provided by Statute 17(22) if you are dissatisfied with the appeal. Grievances must be submitted within 14 calendar days of the letter informing you of the outcome of the appeal, and must be made in writing to the Secretary to Council. Grievances can be made only on one or both of the following grounds:

(a) Procedural irregularity in the conduct of the case;

(b) There is new evidence that can be proven, including exceptional circumstances, which was not known at the time of the review, and may have affected the outcome had the Committee  known. There must be a valid reason for not making it known at the time.

12. EXAMINATION

12.1 To be eligible for the professional doctorate award, you are required to submit a thesis. The expected length of the thesis will vary by programme and this will be defined in the programme specification. For professional doctorate programmes the thesis has to be in the range of 60,000 to 75,000 words, depending on the programme.

13. THESIS

13.1 The thesis must be written in English, except in language subjects where the supervisor and Research Degrees Committee has agreed it can be in another language. Elements of the thesis may be presented in an additional language with the approval of the Research Degrees Committee.

13.2 The thesis must be your own account of your research and must be accompanied by a declaration stating this. A breach of this regulation can result in an allegation of academic misconduct (see Regulation D4).

13.3 Every copy of a thesis submitted must include an abstract of a maximum of 300 words.

13.4 The majority of the work that contributes to the thesis must have been undertaken since registering onto the current programme of study. Any work or any thesis previously submitted to a higher education institution, including Keele, cannot normally be re-submitted, except as part of a re-examination, unless it has been agreed with the supervisor and clearly indicated in the thesis and on the declaration form. Please refer to the Code of Practice for minimum work contributions required for transfers into Keele.

13.5 Before the degree is awarded, you must deposit an electronic copy of your thesis with the University Library. This copy will then be the property of the University.

14. ORAL EXAMINATION AND AWARD

14.1 You must attend an oral examination.

14.2 Once it receives your approved title and an examination panel nomination from Faculty Postgraduate Research Committee, the Research Degrees Committee will appoint a minimum of two examiners and an independent chair for your oral examination. One of the examiners must be external.

14.3 There will be two external examiners in the following circumstances :

(a) If the PGR is also a member of Keele academic staff;

(b) If no appropriate internal examiner can be found;

(c) Any other circumstances where the Research Degrees Committee considers it necessary to have a second external examiner.

14.4 Following the oral examination, the examiners will recommend to the Research Degrees Committee that:

(a) you be awarded the degree for which you have submitted your thesis; or

(b) you be awarded the degree for which you have submitted your thesis once satisfactory revisions have been made to the thesis; or

(c) you have not met the required standard for the award, but your submission is of sufficient merit to permit you to re-present your thesis within one calendar year from the date of the decision at the relevant meeting of the Research Degrees Committee and to attend a further oral examination should the examiners require it. A second oral examination will be required unless both examiners agree that the quality of the resubmitted work meets the criteria for award of a thesis (paragraph 14.4.a or 14.4.b above). The procedures for an oral examination following resubmission will be the same as those for an initial oral examination, and the examiners are required to agree a joint recommendation; or

(d) instead of a Level 8 award, you should be approved for a Level 7 exit award, subject to any minor amendments; or

(e) instead of a Level 8 award, you should be permitted to re-present the thesis for a Level 7 award, and, where required by the examiners, to attend a further oral examination within one calendar year from the date of the decision at the relevant meeting of the Research Degrees Committee.

In some cases it may also be possible to submit a dissertation or shorter thesis for a Level 7 exit award. Where Level 7 exit awards are based on taught modules, they will be classified in accordance with Regulation C7. The exit awards available and the requirements for these will be set out in the programme specification for your programme here; or

(f) you should not be awarded any degree, nor be permitted to re-present the thesis, nor submit to any further examination.

(g) where the examiners are unable to come to a joint recommendation, an additional examiner or examiners should be appointed to resolve the matter.

14.5 You can appeal against the decision of the Research Degrees Committee following Regulation B6.

14.6 Posthumous

(a) A postgraduate research degree can be conferred posthumously if a PGR dies before they were able to complete the requirements of their award. A posthumous award can be accepted on the PGR's behalf by a parent, spouse or other appropriate individual. If the PGR had submitted their thesis for examination but had not yet been examined, examiners will be appointed in the usual way and will submit reports to the Research Degrees Committee for consideration.

(b) If a PGR dies before they were able to submit their thesis for examination, the Research Degrees Committee will consider available evidence of the PGR's ability. A sufficient amount of the research must have been completed in order to determine if the required standard has been achieved. The supervisor will submit a written statement to support the recommendation.

14.7 Aegrotat

(a) An aegrotat award for incomplete study may be conferred in exceptional circumstances, such as a PGR being unable to complete their award due to severe illness. All research awards are available as aegrotat awards, except degree programmes that are subject to fitness to practise requirements.

(b) An aegrotat award is a final exit award; therefore it must be the end of the PGR's programme of study. Before a recommendation for an aegrotat award is submitted, the PGR must indicate that they are willing to accept the award and that they understand that they are waiving their right to be reasssessed.

(c) If the PGR had submitted their thesis for examination, examiners will be appointed in the usual way and will submit reports to the Research Degrees Committee for consideration.

(d) If the PGR has not submitted their thesis for examination, the Research Degrees Committee will consider available evidence of the PGR's ability. A sufficient amount of the research must have been completed in order to determine if the required standard has been achieved. The supervisor will submit a written statement to support the recommendation.

15. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

15.1 We, Keele University, own any Intellectual Property that arises from your studies for a research degree at the University. You must comply with the arrangements for ownership and management of the intellectual property rights as set out in the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees.

16. AWARD RULES

 16.1 Professional Doctorate awards are not classified. The full award title and abbreviation will be set out in the relevant programme specification.

17. TERMINATION OF STUDIES

17.1 The PGR Code of Practice and Regulation B8 describe the circumstances where your studies at the University could be terminated.

18. ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT

18.1 Any allegation of academic misconduct shall be dealt with in accordance with Regulation D4 - Student Academic Misconduct, and the University's Student Academic Misconduct Code of Practice.