Skip to main content Accessibility
Home
Skip to main content Accessibility Home
  • Foundation
  • Undergraduate 2025
  • Postgraduate
  • Research
  • CPD
    •
  • Student Home
  • Welcome new students
  • Cost-of-living support
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Let us know
  • Student KLE
  • Staff Directory
  • Library
    •
  • Intranet
    •
    Alumni
  • Faculties
  • Schools
  • Institutes
  • Research Institutes
    •
  • China
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • India
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • Pakistan
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UK International
  • Rest of the world
  • Visa
    •

    Research Integrity Resources

    Here you'll find a selection of resources relating to Research Integrity. If you find an item that you feel could or should be listed please get in touch with the Research Integrity team.

    Wellcome Report - What Researchers Think About Research Culture
    UKRI Report - Research Integrity: A Landscape Study

    Lucas, G.N., 2010. Singapore statement on research integrity. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 39(4), pp.126–127. 

    The Office of Research Integrity definition of research misconduct

    The Office of Research Integrity - it's a slippery slope to Research Misconduct

    American Scientist article on how to detect faked photos

    Enago Academy - Scientific fraud - how journals detect image manipulation - part 1

    Enago Academy - Scientific fraud - how journals detect image manipulation - part 2

    The Office of Research Integrity - online learning tool for research integrity and image processing

    List of other useful resources from the Image Data Integrity initiative

    Koppers, L., Wormer, H. & Ickstadt, K. Towards a Systematic Screening Tool for Quality Assurance and Semiautomatic Fraud Detection for Images in the Life Sciences. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 1113–1128 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9841-7

    COPE report 2003 - How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers

    Authorship: Musings about guests and ghosts - Citrome - 2017 - International Journal of Clinical Practice  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12986 

    UK Research Integrity Office, 2010: Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals

    UK Research Integrity Office, 2017: Good practice in research: Authorship

    COPE webinar (2017) Standards in authorship

    Author services supporting Taylor and Francis authors - Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences

    Reappraised Checklist - to assess whether a paper has flaws that call its integrity into question

    Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy

    Predatory Publishing guidance from COPE

    Dynamic Ecology

    Retraction Watch